CourtListener 10150604•State v. Davis
Full text
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Curt Davis, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2017-000190
Appeal From Lexington County
Eugene C. Griffith, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-270
Submitted June 1, 2018 – Filed June 27, 2018
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Taylor Davis Gilliam, of Columbia,
and Curt Davis, pro se, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.1
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HUFF, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.