SCDSS v. Lacey W. Sisler

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Lacey W. Sisler, Appellant.

In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2017-001834

Appeal From Anderson County
David E. Phillips, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-210
Submitted April 26, 2018 – Filed May 9, 2018

AFFIRMED

Kimberly Yancey Brooks, of Kimberly Y. Brooks,
Attorney at Law, of Greenville, for Appellant.

James Victor McDade, of Doyle Tate & McDade, PA, of
Anderson, for Respondent.

John Marshall Swails Jr., of Greenville, for the Guardian
ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Lacey W. Sisler appeals the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann.
§ 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2017). Upon a thorough review of the transcript and the
family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte
Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that
warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve
Sisler's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

LOCKEMY, C.J., and WILLIAMS and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.