The RMUE v. Bolds

CourtListener 10150441ScctappFeb 14, 2018

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The RMUE through its General Officers Barbara B.
Clark, Warren E. Hatcher, Cassie Keeton, Daniel Green,
Powell Hampton, Amos Hatcher, Bobby Keeton, James
Moseley and Willie B. Oliver, Respondents,

v.

Herman Bolds, Richard Brown Cecil Parker, Theodore
Miller, Carl Miller, Joan S. Roper, Martha Matthews,
Thomasina G. Walker, Marilyn S. Washington, Jaree R.
Stanley, Audrey Wilder, Derrick Lucas, Willie Parker,
Jr., James Cromwell, James A. Roper, III, Elizabeth R.
Parker, Jacqueline R. Miller and Payne Church,
Appellants.

Appellate Case No. 2016-000513

Appeal From Charleston County
J. C. Nicholson, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-082
Submitted January 1, 2018 – Filed February 14, 2018

AFFIRMED

Eduardo Kelvin Curry, of The Curry Law Firm LLC, of
North Charleston, for Appellants.
Darrell T. Johnson, Jr. and Mills Lane Morrison, Jr., both
of Law Offices of Darrell Thomas Johnson, Jr. LLC, of
Hardeeville, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
authorities: Major v. Penn Cmty. Servs., Inc., 395 S.C. 175, 180, 717 S.E.2d 70, 72
(Ct. App. 2011) ("Generally, an action to quiet title is one in equity."); Hilton Head
Plantation Prop. Owners' Ass'n v. Donald, 375 S.C. 220, 223, 651 S.E.2d 614, 616
(Ct. App. 2007) (per curiam) ("[W]hen the defendant's answer raises an issue of
paramount title to land, such as would, if established, defeat the plaintiff's action,
the issue of title is legal."); Major, 395 S.C. at 180, 717 S.E.2d at 72 ("Therefore,
in a case tried without a jury, the factual findings of a [circuit court] regarding title
will not be disturbed on appeal unless found to be without evidence [that]
reasonably supports the [circuit court]'s findings."); Lowcountry Open Land Tr. v.
State, 347 S.C. 96, 103, 552 S.E.2d 778, 782 (Ct. App. 2001) ("[T]he party
asserting a transfer of title bears the burden of proving its own good title.");
Mulherin-Howell v. Cobb, 362 S.C. 588, 601, 608 S.E.2d 587, 594 (Ct. App. 2005)
("A quitclaim deed does not guarantee the quality of title, but only conveys that
which the grantor may lawfully convey."); Von Elbrecht v. Jacobs, 286 S.C. 240,
243, 332 S.E.2d 568, 570 (Ct. App. 1985) ("[A] grantor of real property generally
can transfer no greater interest than he himself has in the property.").

AFFIRMED.1

WILLIAMS, THOMAS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.