State v. Hoover

CourtListener 10150312ScctappOct 4, 2017

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Lexie Edward Hoover, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2016-002277

Appeal From Colleton County
Michael G. Nettles, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-364
Submitted September 1, 2017 – Filed October 4, 2017

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department
of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, and Attorney
General Alan McCrory Wilson, both of Columbia, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

LOCKEMY, C.J., and HUFF and HILL, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.