Ronald Coulter v. State of SC

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Ronald Coulter #300410, Appellant,

v.

State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2013-002379

Appeal From Charleston County
R. Markley Dennis, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-378
Submitted September 1, 2017 – Filed October 18, 2017

AFFIRMED

Ronald Coulter, pro se.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant
Attorney General James Rutledge Johnson, both of
Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
authorities: McWee v. State, 357 S.C. 403, 406, 593 S.E.2d 456, 457 (2004)
("Habeas relief will be granted only for a constitutional claim rising to the level of
'a violation, which in the setting, constitutes a denial of fundamental fairness
shocking to the universal sense of justice.'" (quoting Green v. Maynard, 349 S.C.
535, 538, 564 S.E.2d 83, 84 (2002))); Williams v. Ozmint, 380 S.C. 473, 477, 671
S.E.2d 600, 602 (2008) ("Habeas relief is seldom used and acts as an ultimate
ensurer of fundamental constitutional rights.").

AFFIRMED.1

SHORT, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.