In the Matter of Chisolm

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Alton
Chisolm, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2014-002351

Appeal From Charleston County
R. Markley Dennis, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-240
Submitted May 1, 2017 – Filed June 7, 2017

APPEAL DISMISSED

James Kristian Falk, of Falk Law Firm, LLC, of
Charleston, and Alton Chisolm, pro se, both for
Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant
Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe, both of Columbia,
for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).1 Counsel's motion
to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.2

WILLIAMS and KONDUROS, JJ., and LEE, A.J., concur.

1
See In re McCoy, 360 S.C. 425, 602 S.E.2d 58 (2004) (adopting the Anders
procedure for alleged no-merit appeals in sexually violent predator involuntary
commitment appeals).
2
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.