SunTrust v. Ostendorff

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

SunTrust Mortgage, Inc., Respondent,

v.

Mark Ostendorff, Appellant

Appellate Case No. 2015-000198

Appeal From York County
S. Jackson Kimball, III, Master-in-Equity

Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-234
Submitted March 1, 2017 – Filed May 31, 2017

APPEAL DISMISSED

Mark Ostendorff, of Central, pro se.

Brian Steed Tatum, of Tatum Law firm, PLLC, of
Charlotte, North Carolina, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: We dismiss this appeal pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and
Shields v. Martin Marietta Corp., 303 S.C. 469, 470, 402 S.E.2d 482, 483 (1991)
(holding an order restoring a case to the active docket is not directly appealable).
AFFIRMED.1

LOCKEMY, C.J., and HUFF and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.