Walker v. SAIC Engineering

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Anne Nicholson, Obie Varner, Lois Parker, Gloria
Sinsuat, Elizabeth Sharper, Preston Grant, Alice Felder
and Sebrina Walker, Plaintiffs,

Of whom Sebrina Walker is the Appellant,

v.

SAIC Engineering, Inc., Christina Broom, John Kiessling
and Marcia Saari, Respondents.

Appellate Case No. 2015-001114

Appeal From Berkeley County
J. C. Nicholson, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-172
Submitted February 1, 2017 – Filed April 19, 2017

AFFIRMED

Sebrina Walker, of Charleston, pro se.

Ashley Prickett Cuttino, of Ogletree Deakins Nash
Smoak & Stewart, PC, of Greenville, for Respondents
SAIC Engineering, Inc., John Kiessling, and Marcia
Saari.
PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
authorities: Germain v. Nichol, 278 S.C. 508, 509, 299 S.E.2d 335, 335 (1983)
("Appellant has the burden of providing this [c]ourt with a sufficient record upon
which this [c]ourt can make its decision."); id. (affirming the trial court's judgment
when the appellant failed to present the appellate court with "any of the trial
testimony" to support his argument that the evidence did not justify the damages
award).

AFFIRMED.1

LOCKEMY, C.J., and GEATHERS and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.