HSBC Mortgage Services v. Lucas

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

HSBC Mortgage Services Inc., Respondent,

v.

Alice Lucas a/k/a Alice Marie Felder-Lucas; Dwight
Lucas; Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
(MIN #100176105012597608); Mortgage Electronic
Registration Systems, Inc. (MIN # 1002033-
0000024059-5); Windsor Lake Park Homeowners
Association, Inc.; Defendants,

Of Whom Alice Lucas and Dwight Lucas are the
Appellants.

Appellate Case No. 2014-000747

Appeal From Richland County
Joseph M. Strickland, Master-in-Equity

Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-262
Submitted February 1, 2016 – Filed June 8, 2016

AFFIRMED

Dwight Lucas and Alice Lucas, both of Columbia, pro se.
Rebecca Kinlein Lindahl and Richard L Farley, both of
Katten Muchin Rosenman, LLP, of Charlotte, North
Carolina, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
authorities: Bryson v. Bryson, 378 S.C. 502, 510, 662 S.E.2d 611, 615 (Ct. App.
2008) ("An issue is deemed abandoned and will not be considered on appeal if the
argument is raised in a brief but not supported by authority."); In re McCracken,
346 S.C. 87, 92, 551 S.E.2d 235, 238 (2001) ("A bald assertion, without supporting
argument, does not preserve an issue for appeal."); B & A Dev., Inc. v. Georgetown
Cty., 372 S.C. 261, 271, 641 S.E.2d 888, 894 (2007) ("It is well settled that an
issue . . . must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial court to be preserved
for appellate review.").

AFFIRMED.1

HUFF, A.C.J., and KONDUROS and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.