In the Matter of Larry Edward Hendricks

CourtListener 10149498ScctappApr 13, 2016

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Larry Edward
Hendricks, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2014-000205

Appeal From Fairfield County
R. Knox McMahon, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-173
Submitted January 1, 2016 – Filed April 13, 2016

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Laura Ruth Baer, of Columbia; and
Larry Edward Hendricks, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe,
both of Columbia; and Solicitor Douglas A. Barfield, Jr.,
of Kershaw, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and In re McCoy,
360 S.C. 425, 427, 602 S.E.2d 58, 59 (2004). Counsel's motion to be relieved is
granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1

FEW, C.J., and KONDUROS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.