State v. Copeland

CourtListener 10149474ScctappMar 2, 2016

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Obryan Exxidice Copeland, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2014-000703

Appeal From Laurens County
R. Lawton McIntosh, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-096
Submitted January 1, 2016 – Filed March 2, 2016

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Benjamin John Tripp, of Columbia;
and Obryan Exxidice Copeland, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Interim
Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John
Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia; and Solicitor David
Matthew Stumbo, of Greenwood, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.