State v. McKever

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Austen Syntell McKever, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2014-002707

Appeal From Florence County
D. Craig Brown, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-060
Submitted December 1, 2015 – Filed February 17, 2016

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Tiffany Lorraine Butler, of
Columbia; and Austen Syntell McKever, pro se, for
Appellant.

Matthew C. Buchanan, of the Department of Probation,
Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., and KONDUROS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.