State v. Carr

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Jay C. Carr, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2014-000014

Appeal From Greenville County
Edward W. Miller, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-539
Submitted October 1, 2015 – Filed November 25, 2015

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender John Harrison Strom, of Columbia,
for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant
Attorney General J. Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia;
and Solicitor W. Walter Wilkins, III, of Greenville, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
authorities: State v. Johnston, 333 S.C. 459, 462, 510 S.E.2d 423, 425 (1999)
("[The South Carolina Supreme Court] has consistently held that a challenge to
sentencing must be raised at trial, or the issue will not be preserved for appellate
review."); State v. Shumate, 276 S.C. 46, 47, 275 S.E.2d 288, 288 (1981) ("A
defendant's failure to timely object to or seek modification of his sentence in the
trial court precludes him from presenting his objection for the first time on
appeal."); State v. Nichols, 325 S.C. 111, 120, 481 S.E.2d 118, 123 (1997) ("An
issue may not be raised for the first time on appeal, but must have been raised to
the trial judge to be preserved for appellate review."); State v. Sawyer, 409 S.C.
475, 479 n.2, 763 S.E.2d 183, 185 n.2 (2014) ("It is well-settled that a party cannot
complain of an error it induced.").

AFFIRMED.1

SHORT, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.