State v. Hall

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Bruce Dewayne Hall, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2013-002390

Appeal From Aiken County
D. Garrison Hill, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-232
Submitted April 1, 2015 – Filed May 6, 2015

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant
Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of
Columbia; and Solicitor James Strom Thurmond, Jr., of
Aiken, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
authority: State v. Price, 368 S.C. 494, 499, 629 S.E.2d 363, 366 (2006)
("Generally, appellate courts will not set aside convictions due to insubstantial
errors not affecting the result. Thus, an insubstantial error not affecting the result
of the trial is harmless where guilt has been conclusively proven by competent
evidence such that no other rational conclusion can be reached. Where a review of
the entire record establishes the error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt, the
conviction should not be reversed." (citations omitted)).

AFFIRMED.1

THOMAS, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.