SCDSS v. Hooper

CourtListener 10148977ScctappMay 26, 2015

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Zena-Dawn Marie Hooper, Fred Lamont Walker, and
Tony Leron Abney, Defendants,

Of Whom Zena-Dawn Marie Hooper is the Appellant.

In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2014-002732

Appeal From Greenville County
Alvin D. Johnson, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-268
Submitted April 23, 2015 – Filed May 26, 2015

AFFIRMED

Matthew P. Head, of Head Law Firm, LLC, of
Greenville, for Appellant.

Rebecca Rush Wray, of Greenville, for Respondent.
Robert John Stephenson IV, of Robert J. Stephenson
Attorney at Law, of Greenville, for the Guardian ad
Litem.

PER CURIAM: Zena-Dawn Marie Hooper appeals the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-
2570 (Supp. 2014). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's
findings of facts and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C.
465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Hooper's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

THOMAS, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.