In the Interest of Zachary R. v. State

CourtListener 10148960ScctappApr 8, 2015

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

In the Interest of Zachary R., A Juvenile under the Age of
Seventeen, Respondent,

v.

State of South Carolina, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2013-001974

Appeal From Charleston County
Jocelyn B. Cate, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-183
Submitted March 1, 2015 – Filed April 8, 2015

DISMISSED

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant
Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of
Columbia; and Solicitor Scarlett Wilson, of Charleston,
for Appellant.

John S. Nichols, of Bluestein, Nichols, Thompson &
Delgado, LLC, of Columbia; and Andrew John Savage,
III, of Savage Law Firm, of Charleston, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: We dismiss the appeal pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the
following authorities: S.C. Code Ann. § 63-3-630(A) (2010) ("Any appeal from an
order, judgment, or decree of the family court shall be taken in the manner
provided by the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules. The right to appeal must
be governed by the same rules, practices, and procedures that govern appeals from
the circuit court."); Levi v. N. Anderson Cnty. EMS, 409 S.C. 374, 379, 762 S.E.2d
44, 47 (Ct. App. 2014) ("An appellate court may determine the question of
appealability of a decision from a lower court as a matter of law." (quotation marks
omitted)); id. ("Even if not raised by the parties, this court may address the issue of
appealability ex mero motu." (quotation marks omitted)); In re Lorenzo B., 307
S.C. 439, 439, 415 S.E.2d 795, 795 (1992) ("An order adjudicating a juvenile to be
a delinquent is not immediately appealable."); id. ("Instead, an appeal may only be
taken after the imposition of final judgment at the dispositional hearing.").

DISMISSED.1

THOMAS, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.