SCDSS v. Wright

CourtListener 10148800ScctappJan 9, 2015

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Marvina Wright and John Doe, Defendants,

Of whom Marvina Wright is the Appellant.

In the interest of a minor child under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2014-001342

Appeal From Dillon County
Michael S. Holt, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-032
Submitted December 16, 2014 – Filed January 9, 2015

AFFIRMED

Sally Ward Peace, of Sally Ward Peace, P.A., of
Conway, for Appellant.

John D. McInnis, Jr., of John D. McInnis, Jr., Attorney at
Law, of Dillon, for Respondent.
Jesse Stanley Cartrette, of Florence, for the Guardian ad
Litem.

PER CURIAM: Marvina Wright appeals from the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-
2570 (Supp. 2014). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's
findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C.
465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Wright's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

FEW, C.J., and THOMAS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.