CourtListener 10148648•State v. Craig
Full text
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Kenneth Jowan Craig, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2013-001690
Appeal From Spartanburg County
Roger L. Couch, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-431
Heard November 6, 2014 – Filed November 26, 2014
AFFIRMED
Dennis Gregory Placone, of Nexsen Pruet, LLC, and
Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, both of
Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant
Attorney General Jennifer Ellis Roberts, both of
Columbia; and Solicitor Barry Joe Barnette, of
Spartanburg, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
authority: Perry v. New Hampshire, 132 S. Ct. 716, 728 (2012) ("The fallibility of
eyewitness evidence does not, without the taint of improper state conduct, warrant
a due process rule requiring a trial court to screen such evidence for reliability
before allowing the jury to assess its creditworthiness."); id. at 730 ("[T]he Due
Process Clause does not require a preliminary judicial inquiry into the reliability of
an eyewitness identification when the identification was not procured under
unnecessarily suggestive circumstances arranged by law enforcement.").
AFFIRMED.
FEW, C.J., and GEATHERS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.