Vennekamp v. Schaffler Group

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Vickey D. Vennekamp, Appellant,

v.

Schaffler Group, USA, and The Phoenix Insurance
Company, Respondents.

Appellate Case No. 2012-213392

Appeal From The Workers' Compensation Commission

Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-097
Heard January 7, 2014 – Filed March 5, 2014

APPEAL DISMISSED

Gretchen Aynsley Rogers, of Berman Sobin Gross
Feldman & Darby, LLP, of Columbia, and Michael
Joseph O'Sullivan, of the Law Office of Michael J.
O'Sullivan, of Conway, for Appellant.

Franklin D. Guerrero, Jr., of Willson Jones Carter &
Baxley, P.A., of Greenville, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM: Vickey D. Vennekamp appeals the finding of the Workers'
Compensation Commission's Appellate Panel ordering the termination of her
temporary total benefits, arguing her employer, Schaffler Group, USA, and its
carrier, Phoenix Insurance Company, failed to file a Form 21 as required by the
Regulations of the South Carolina Code. We dismiss the appeal pursuant to Rule
220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Martinez v. Spartanburg Cnty., 406
S.C. 532, ___, 753 S.E.2d 436, 437 (2014) (stating that under the Administrative
Procedures Act, only final judgments of administrative agencies may be appealed);
Bone v. U.S. Food Serv., 404 S.C. 67, 84, 744 S.E.2d 552, 561 (2013) (holding the
same).

APPEAL DISMISSED.
FEW, C.J., and PIEPER and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.