CourtListener 10148340•State v. Stackhouse
Full text
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Edward W. Stackhouse, Jr., Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2012-212058
Appeal From Marion County
William H. Seals, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-051
Submitted November 1, 2013 – Filed February 5, 2014
APPEAL DISMISSED
Chief Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, of
Columbia; and Edward W. Stackhouse, Jr., pro se, for
Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.1
APPEAL DISMISSED.
FEW, C.J., and PIEPER and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.