CourtListener 10148205•State v. Sparks
Full text
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Kurt Kalani Sparks, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2012-211956
Appeal From Newberry County
Edward W. Miller, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-405
Submitted October 1, 2013 – Filed November 6, 2013
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, for
Appellant.
Tommy Evans, Jr., of South Carolina Department of
Probation, Parole, and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HUFF, GEATHERS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.