State v. Herrera

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respodent,

v.

Miguel Herrera, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2012-213538

Appeal From Darlington County
Thomas A. Russo, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-386
Submitted August 1, 2013 – Filed October 9, 2013

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Breen Richard Stevens, of Columbia;
and Miguel Herrera, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., and PIEPER and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.