State v. McDowell

CourtListener 10148159ScctappOct 9, 2013

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Herbert McDowell, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2011-182926

Appeal From Florence County
Thomas A. Russo, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-383
Submitted September 1, 2013 – Filed October 9, 2013

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia; and
Hebert McDowell, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
both of Columbia; and Solicitor Edgar L. Clements, III,
of Florence, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT, WILLIAMS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.