State v. Lisenby

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Billy Lee Lisenby, Jr., Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2011-201487

Appeal From Chesterfield County
Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-335
Submitted July 1, 2013 – Filed August 7, 2013

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Dayne C. Phillips, of Columbia; and
Billy Lee Lisenby, Jr., pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Douglas A. Barfield, Jr., of
Lancaster, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT, THOMAS, and PIEPER, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.