Walton v. Union County Carnegie

CourtListener 10147801ScctappMay 29, 2013

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Cynthia Walton, Employee, Claimant, Respondent,

v.

Union County Carnegie Library, Employer, SC
Association of Counties, SIF, Carrier, Appellants.

Appellate Case No. 2012-212599

Appeal From The Workers' Compensation Commission

Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-231
Heard May 15, 2013 – Filed May 29, 2013

AFFIRMED

Richard B. Kale, Jr., Willson Jones Carter & Baxley,
P.A., of Greenville, for Appellants.

Jeremy Andrew Dantin, Harrison White Smith &
Coggins, P.C., of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Union County Carnegie Library and its insurance carrier appeal
the workers' compensation commission's decision that employee Cynthia Walton
sustained a compensable injury to her right shoulder. We find substantial evidence
in the record to support the commission's decision. Therefore, we affirm pursuant
to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities: Ardis v. Combined Ins.
Co., 380 S.C. 313, 320, 669 S.E.2d 628, 632 (Ct. App. 2008) ("Our review is
limited to deciding whether the Commission's decision is unsupported by
substantial evidence or is controlled by some error of law."); Tims v. J.D. Kitts
Constr., 393 S.C. 496, 508, 713 S.E.2d 340, 346 (Ct. App. 2011) (stating the final
determination of witness credibility and the weight to be accorded evidence is
reserved to the appellate panel).

AFFIRMED.

FEW, C.J., and GEATHERS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.