SCDSS v. Michael D.

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Michael D. and Heather K., Defendants,

Of whom Michael D. is the Appellant,

In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen years.

Appellate Case No. 2012-212035

Appeal From Berkeley County
Jack A. Landis, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-048
Submitted January 17, 2013 – Filed January 23, 2013

AFFIRMED

Kathleen Elisabeth Hoover, of Manley Law Firm, LLC,
of Moncks Corner, for Appellant.

Sean Bannon Zenner, of Zenner Law Firm, of Loudon,
TN, and Paul C. White, of the South Carolina
Department of Social Services, of Pickens, for
Respondent.

Sean Keefer, of Sean F. Keefer, LLC, of Charleston, for
the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Michael D. appeals the family court's order of intervention. S.C.
Code Ann. § 63-7-1650(A) (2010). Upon a thorough review of the record and the
family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex Parte
Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that
warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling.

AFFIRMED.1

SHORT, KONDUROS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.