State v. Myers

CourtListener 10147632ScctappJan 30, 2013

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

David Myers, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2011-195026

Appeal From Florence County
Thomas A. Russo, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-051
Submitted January 1, 2013 – Filed January 30, 2013

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia; and
David Myers, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Douglas A. Barfield, Jr., of
Lancaster, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.