SCDSS v. Elizabeth H.

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Elizabeth H. and Roger H., Defendants,

Of Whom Roger H. is the Appellant,

In the interest of minor children under the age of 18.

Appellate Case No. 2012-205466

Appeal From Pickens County
Alex Kinlaw, Jr., Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-652
Submitted November 1, 2012 – Filed December 12, 2012

AFFIRMED

Rodney Wade Richey, of Richey & Richey, PA, of
Greenville, for Appellant.

Patti Austin Brady, of the South Carolina Department of
Social Services, of Pickens, for Respondent.
Karen G. Pruitt, of Karen G. Pruitt, Attorney at Law, of
Central, for Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Roger H. appeals the family court's Order of Intervention. Upon
a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and
conclusions of law pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381
(1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the
family court's ruling.

AFFIRMED.1

SHORT, KONDUROS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.