State v. Kelley

CourtListener 10147603ScctappDec 12, 2012

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Cameren Laroderick Kelley, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2011-203727

Appeal From Sumter County
Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-656
Submitted November 1, 2012 – Filed December 12, 2012

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia; and
Cameren Laroderick Kelley, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Senior Assistant Deputy
Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and
Ernest Adolphus Finney, III, of Sumter, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., and WILLIAMS and PIEPER, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.