State v. Mathis

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent

v.

Robert Mathis, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2011-187426

Appeal From Cherokee County
Roger L. Couch, Special Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-524
Submitted August 1, 2012 – Filed September 12, 2012

DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of the South Carolina Department of
Probation, Parole & Pardon Services, of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Robert Mathis appeals his probation revocation, arguing the
probation revocation hearing was too summary in nature. After a thorough review
of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the
appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.1

DISMISSED.

SHORT, KONDUROS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.