State v. Mauney

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD
NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.
Shelly Mauney, Appellant.

__________

Appeal From Horry County
Larry B. Hyman, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
__________

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-478
Submitted April 1, 2012 – Filed August 8, 2012
__________

APPEAL DISMISSED
__________

Chief Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant
Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of
Columbia; and Solicitor J. Gregory Hembree, of
Conway, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Shelly Mauney appeals her conviction of second-
degree burglary, arguing the circuit court erred in denying her motion for a
directed verdict because the State failed to bring evidence that Mauney
lacked consent to enter the building burglarized. After a thorough review of
the record and brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the
appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., HUFF and SHORT, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.