State v. Cheeks

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD
NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.
Craig Cheeks, Appellant.

__________

Appeal From Greenville County
Robin B. Stilwell, Circuit Court Judge

__________

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-423
Submitted June 1, 2012 – Filed July 11, 2012
__________

APPEAL DISMISSED
__________

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor W. Walter Wilkins, III,
of Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Craig Cheeks appeals his convictions of driving under
suspension and violating the habitual traffic offender statute, arguing the
circuit court erred in failing to (1) grant his directed verdict motion and (2)
give the jury an alibi charge. After a thorough review of the record and
counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and
State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss1 the
appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., and HUFF and SHORT, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.