State v. Hagood

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

John Allen Hagood, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2011-185626

Appeal From Greenville County
C. Victor Pyle, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-407
Submitted July 2, 2012 – Filed July 11, 2012

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Elizabeth A. Franklin-Best, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Senior Assistant Deputy
Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Assistant Deputy
Attorney General David A. Spencer, all of Columbia; and
Solicitor W. Walter Wilkins, III, of Greenville, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: John Allen Hagood appeals his convictions of first-degree
burglary and grand larceny. Hagood argues the trial court erred in admitting into
evidence a statement he made to investigators confessing to the charges. We
affirm1 pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authority: State v.
Mitchell, 330 S.C. 189, 193 n.3, 498 S.E.2d 642, 644 n.3 (1998) (holding "a ruling
in limine is not final, and unless an objection is made at the time the evidence is
offered and a final ruling procured, the issue is not preserved for review").

AFFIRMED.

PIEPER, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.