SCDSS v. Amanda B.

CourtListener 10147364ScctappJul 18, 2012

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Amanda B., Ollie L. B., Daniel H., Sr., and Allen B.,
Defendants,

Of whom Daniel H., Sr., is the Appellant.

In the interest of three minor children under the age of
18.

Appellate Case No. 2011-191347

Appeal From Lancaster County
Brian M. Gibbons, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-444
Submitted July 2, 2012 – Filed July 18, 2012

AFFIRMED

Rosalee Hix Davis, of White Rose Law, of York, and
David Clayton Cook, of Cook Law Firm, LLC, of
Lancaster, for Appellant.
Calvin Leon Goodwin, of the South Carolina Department
of Social Services, of Winnsboro, for Respondent.

Coreen B. Khoury, of Folks Khoury & DeVenny, LLC,
of Lancaster, for Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Daniel H., Sr., appeals the family court's final order
terminating his parental rights to his minor children. See S.C. Code Ann.
§ 63-7-2570 (2010). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen,
291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant
briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling.

AFFIRMED.1

PIEPER, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.