State v. Bailey

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Sherry K.
Bailey, Appellant.

Appeal From Greenville County

 G. Edward Welmaker, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2007-UP-410

Submitted October 1, 2007 – Filed October
4, 2007

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, South Carolina Commission
on Indigent Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott ,
Office of the Attorney General, of Columbia; and Solicitor Robert M. Ariail, of
Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Appellant, Sherry K. Bailey, was convicted of assault
and battery and sentenced to imprisonment for thirty days or a fine of $500.  Bailey’s counsel attached to the brief a
petition to be relieved as counsel, stating that she had reviewed the record
and concluded this appeal lacks merit.  Bailey did not file a separate pro se brief.  After a thorough review of the record pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN,
CJ., HUFF, and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.