State v. Jackson

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In the Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Sharon Jackson, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

James R. Barber, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-419

Submitted October 1, 2007 – Filed October 8, 2007

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief
Attorney Joseph L. Savitz, III, South Carolina Commission on Indigent Defense,
of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Office
of the Attorney General; and Solicitor Warren B. Giese, all of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER
CURIAM:  Sharon Jackson appeals her guilty plea for possession
of crack cocaine.  She asserts her guilty plea was rendered conditional and
therefore invalid by the trial judge informing her of the right to an appeal. After a thorough review of the record and
counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Jackson’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J.,
HUFF and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.