State v. Kordelski

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT
SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS
PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF

SOUTH CAROLINA

In the Court of
Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Richard Michael Kordelski, Appellant.

Appeal From

York

County

John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished
Opinion No. 2007-UP-447

Submitted
October 1, 2007 – Filed October 9, 2007

APPEAL
DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate
Defender Robert M. Dudek,
South
Carolina Commission on Indigent Defense, of

Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster,
Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney
General Salley W. Elliott, Office of the Attorney
General, of Columbia; and Solicitor Thomas E. Pope, of York, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Richard
Michael Kordelski appeals the award of $2,874.00 in
restitution to the victims for the car destroyed in connection with his
conviction for use of a vehicle without permission.  He asserts the circuit court abused its
discretion in awarding this amount to the victims, because it would result in a
windfall.  After a thorough review of the record and
counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991),
we dismiss[1] Kordelski’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be
relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., HUFF and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without
oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.