State v. Shell

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Jonathan Devere
Shell, Appellant.

Appeal from Spartanburg County

 Gordon G. Cooper, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-438

Submitted October 1, 2007 – Filed October
9, 2007   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary,of Columbia, for Appellant.

Deputy Director for Legal Services Teresa A. Knox; Legal Counsel Benjamin
J. Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Jonathan
Devere Shell appeals the revocation of two years of his suspended sentence.  Shell
contends there was no evidentiary showing of facts to support the circuit
court’s decision to revoke his suspended sentence.  Shell’s counsel attached a
petition to be relieved, stating she reviewed the record and concluded this
appeal lacks merit.  Shell did not file a pro se response brief. 
After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief, pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Shell’s appeal and grant counsel’s
motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., HUFF and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.