State v. Busby

CourtListener 10143000ScctappOct 15, 2007

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Perry
Busby Appellant.

Appeal From Aiken County

Jackson V. Gregory, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-489

Submitted October 1, 2007 – Filed October 15, 2007

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief
Attorney Joseph L. Savitz, Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott, Office of the Attorney General, of Columbia; and Solicitor Barbara R.
Morgan, of Aiken, for Respondent.

PER
CURIAM:  Perry Busby appeals his guilty plea for breach of
trust and sentence of nine months imprisonment, arguing the trial court failed
to comply with the mandates set forth in Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238
(1969), in accepting his plea. After a
thorough review of the record and
counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Busby’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., KITTREDGE and CURETON, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.