State v. Patterson

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In the Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Curtis Lee Patterson, Appellant.

Appeal From Lancaster County

G. Edward Welmaker,
Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-485

Submitted October 1, 2007 – Filed October 15, 2007   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate
Defender Aileen P. Clare, III, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Warren B. Giese, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER
CURIAM:  Curtis Lee
Patterson appeals his conviction for assault and battery of a high and
aggravated nature.  He asserts the trial court erred by denying his motion to
exclude testimony of another alleged assault. After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Patterson’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J.,
HUFF and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.