State v. Joyner

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Reginald
Joyner, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

 Kenneth G. Goode, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2007-UP-380

Submitted September 14, 2007 – Filed
September 18, 2007

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, South Carolina
Commission, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
Office of the Attorney General; and Solicitor Warren Blair Giese, all of
Columbia; for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Joyner appeals from his guilty plea to assault and
battery with intent to kill and possession of a stolen motor vehicle, arguing
the plea did not comply with the mandates of Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S.
238 (1969).  After a thorough
review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss Joyner’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN,
C.J., and HUFF and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.