State v. Moses

CourtListener 10142964ScctappSep 18, 2007

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Keith Moses, Appellant.

Appeal From Sumter County

 Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-374

Submitted September 1, 2007 – Filed September 18, 2007   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Teresa A. Knox, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Keith Moses (Appellant) was convicted of possession of crack cocaine and threatening a public official, for which he was sentenced to five years in prison, suspended upon time served and two years probation, plus the payment of a fine.  The court subsequently revoked three years of Appellant’s suspended sentence after finding Appellant violated the terms of his probation.

On appeal, counsel for Appellant has filed a final brief challenging the revocation of Appellant’s probation, along with a petition to be relieved as counsel.  Appellant has not filed a pro se response.  After a thorough review of the record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.          

APPEAL DISMISSED.[1]

HEARN, C.J., and HUFF and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur. 

[1]  This case is decided without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.