State v. Williams

CourtListener 10142902ScctappJun 6, 2007

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Crawford Williams, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

 Lee S. Alford, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-280

Submitted June 1, 2007 – Filed June 6,
2007   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Attorney Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Warren Blair Giese, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Williams
appeals his guilty plea to voluntary manslaughter and assault and battery with
intent to kill.  He was sentenced to concurrent sentences of twenty-five years
for the manslaughter and ten years for the ABWIK.  Williams maintains his
guilty plea was rendered conditional as a result of the trial judge informing
Williams of his right to an appeal.  After
a thorough review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Williams’ pro se brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Williams’ appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J.,
KITTREDGE, J., and CURETON, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.