State v. Harrison

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDINGEXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Eric Harrison, Appellant.

Appeal From Aiken County

 Reginald I. Lloyd, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2007-UP-286

Submitted June 1, 2007 – Filed June 7,
2007

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Attorney Joseph L. Savitz, III, South Carolina Commission on
Indigent Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole
& Pardon, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER
CURIAM:  Eric Harrison appeals his probation revocation.  Harrison argues
the trial court erred in revoking his probation without first apprising him of
his constitutional rights pursuant to Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238
(1969).  This issue is not preserved for appeal.  State v. Adams, 354
S.C. 361, 380, 580 S.E.2d 785, 795 (Ct. App. 2003) (“Arguments not raised to or
ruled upon by the trial court are not preserved for appellate review.”).  After
a thorough review of the record and briefs, pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.     

APPEAL  DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., KITTREDGE, J., and
CURETON, A.J., concur.