State v. Scott

CourtListener 10142882ScctappJun 8, 2007

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT
BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE
239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Terry Perry Michael Scott, Appellant.

Appeal From Pickens County

Larry R. Patterson, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion 2007-UP-303

Submitted June 1, 2007 – Filed June 8,
2007

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for
Appellant. 

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Robert M. Ariail, of Greenville, for
Respondent.

PER
CURIAM:  Terry Perry
Michael Scott appeals his convictions and sentences for criminal sexual conduct
with a minor, second degree, and committing a lewd act on a child.  Counsel for
Scott attached to the final brief a petition to be relieved as counsel.  Scott
filed a separate pro se response.

After a review of the record as required by Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable issues
that are arguable on their merits.  Accordingly, we dismiss Scott’s appeal and
grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

STILWELL, SHORT, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.