Brown v. State

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT
BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE
239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

Marvin Brown, Appellant,

v.

The State, Respondent.

Appeal From Jasper County

John C. Few, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-320

Submitted June 1, 2007 – Filed June 15, 2007 

APPEAL DISMISSED

Joseph L. Savitz, III,
Chief Attorney, South Carolina Commission on Indigent Defense, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney
General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh,
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney
General, Colleen Dixon, Office of the Attorney General, of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER
CURIAM:  On appeal, Marvin Brown claims the circuit court abused its
discretion in denying his motion for a continuance and in granting the State’s
motion to dismiss regarding his petition for writ of habeas corpus.  

After
a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Brown’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be
relieved.    

APPEAL DISMISSED. [1]

STILWELL,
SHORT, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.