State v. Broadwater

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Leon Julius Broadwater, Appellant.

Appeal From Aiken County 

Diane Schafer Goodstein, Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2007-UP-322

Submitted June 1, 2007 – Filed June 15,
2007

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, South Carolina Commission on
Indigent Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, S.C. Dept. of Probation Parole & Pardon, of
Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Leon Broadwater appeals the
circuit court’s decision to revoke his probation.  Broadwater argues he made
every effort to comply with the terms of his probation, and failed to report to
his probation officer because of job commitments. 

After a thorough review of the record, counsel’s brief, and
appellant’s pro se brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED. [1] 

STILWELL,
SHORT, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral arguments pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.