State v. Jenkins

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL
VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(D)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The
State,        Respondent,

v.

Patrick Mark
Jenkins,        Appellant.

Appeal From York County

Paul E. Short, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.
2005-UP-484

Submitted August 1, 2005 – Filed August 15, 2005  

APPEAL DISMISSED

Acting Deputy Chief Attorney
Wanda H. Carter, Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Henry
Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh,
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, of Columbia; and
Solicitor Thomas E. Pope of York, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Patrick
Mark Jenkins appeals his conviction for two counts of obtaining property under
false pretenses and two counts of possession of stolen goods.  He maintains
the trial court erred in admitting the substance of his co-defendant’s
statement into evidence at trial.  Additionally, Jenkins filed a pro
se brief in which he argues discrepancies in the mobile homes’ serial
numbers presented at trial justifies overturning his conviction. After a
thorough review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Jenkins’s pro se
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Jenkins’s
appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ANDERSON, HUFF, and WILLIAMS, JJ.,
concur.   

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215,
SCACR.