State v. Mack

CourtListener 10138442ScctappJul 13, 2005

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL
VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH
CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The
State,        Respondent,

v.

Amos
Mack,        Appellant.

Appeal From Orangeburg County

Edward B. Cottingham, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.
2005-UP-437

Submitted July 1, 2005 – Filed July 13, 2005

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender
Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Henry
Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia;
and Solicitor Robert D. Robbins, of Summerville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Amos Mack
was indicted for failure to stop for a blue light or siren.  Mack was tried
before a jury in his absence, and the jury found him guilty.  The trial
court sentenced Mack to five years imprisonment and revoked Mack’s three-year
suspended sentence on a previous conviction.  Mack’s counsel filed a
petition to be relieved as counsel.  Mack filed a pro se
brief.  After a thorough review of the record pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116,
406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1]
the appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be
relieved.           

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ANDERSON, STILWELL, and WILLIAMS,
JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215,
SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.