State v. Williams

CourtListener 10138437ScctappJul 13, 2005

Full text

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL
VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH
CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The
State,        Respondent,

v.

Tommy J.
Williams,        Appellant.

Appeal From York County

J. Ernest Kinard, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.
2005-UP-436

Submitted July 1, 2005 – Filed July 13, 2005

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender
Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry
Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia;
and Solicitor Thomas E. Pope of York, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Tommy
Williams appeals his convictions pursuant to a guilty plea for grand larceny,
possession of burglary tools, and burglary in the second degree.  Williams
was sentenced to twenty years on the burglary charge, and five years each on the
grand larceny and the possession of burglary tools charges, to be served
concurrently.  On appeal, Williams’ counsel filed a final brief along
with a petition to be relieved as counsel pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).  After a thorough review of the record pursuant to Anders
and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel’s
petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ANDERSON, STILWELL, and WILLIAMS,
JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215,
SCACR.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.